by what l saw with the inccident with bourdais offcourse they want him to win it. very inconsistent decisions have been made this season what could bourdais do. l already declare Massa as f1 Champion hes got the Fia right behind him in every single way. l rate hamilton a 30% chance now as races are becoming a penalty fest and Ferrari have got the FIA (Ferrari International Assistence) right behind them

It appears most viewers with eyes who saw what happened with Bourdais & Massa were expecting the latter to have a post race penalty added.
How on earth it was decided that it was Sebastien is fault beggars belief. It will speak volumes of Ferrari is stranglehold on their customer engine teams if Torro Rosso do not appeal this as it is so wrong it aches.

l am not a subscriber of the Ferrari International Assistance school but feel they have a leaning to the oldest team in F1; to keep them in a prominent place in the sport as it ventures to new territories as they r a huge brand, & as we know, that is all that matters in modern F1.

l am not entirely sure they are going for Massa to win the championship, l do not think they really care who wins, they probably just looked at the ratings from last season when there was a 3 way tie all the way to the last race and are trying as hard as they can to do that again (rememeber Kubica is still a mathematical possibility)

Kimi Raikkonen defeated 2 McLaren drivers last year to the title. & l hope u say there was cheating last year!
The rule book is clear on that one:
''''Incident'' means any occurrence or series of occurrences involving one or more drivers, or any action by
any driver, which is reported to the stewards by the race director (or noted by the stewards & referred to
the race director for investigation) which :
- necessitated the suspension of a race under Article 41 ;
- constituted a breach of these Sporting Regulations or the Code ;
- caused a false start by one or more cars ;
- caused a collision ;
- forced a driver off the track ;
- illegitimately prevented a legitimate overtaking manoeuvre by a driver ;
- illegitimately impeded another driver during overtaking.''
Hamilton did two of them same for Massa so they deserve equal treament
About the Bourdais incident l do not know & l wished the FIA would have left it the way it is.

l am not normally one for conspiracy theory is but it seems as if the fix is in.

Hopefully both the title contenders will continue to make sses of them selves and a deserving driver, Robert Kubica will win the title.

runs into back of Alonso that penalty was deserved, how about when he ran into the back of kimi again deserved. Now l could go on like this but l wont bore u the point is that lewham needs to take a sensible pill & play the percentage game & accumulate the points in the last two races, if he does this he will be the world champion. Getting into wheel to wheel combat with ur nearest rival in the points is not smart. blaming the FIA is pointless they have allot more data Eg. onboard footage than we do so they r just making the decision the see to be right. In summary if lewham stops bitching & gets on with driving he might just win the world championship.

hey mr tyrone-jealous-wood722.hamilton is a bad and dangerous driver, fia should not have let him race in the first place

l too was surprised by the Massa Bourdais incident. But looking at the replay, l realised that Massa was ahead going into the corner.

The stewards may have wanted to be consistent in their rulings as they penalised Massa for hitting Hamilton when Hamilton was ahead coming out of the corner.

So perhaps the guy who is behind gets the penalty?